Rate this Resource

Average: 0/5

Tags

You must be logged in to add a tag.

Advertisement

Western Resource Advocates

RESOURCE: Western Resource Advocates

11-11-09 

Forward this message to a friend Forward this message to a friend

Western Resource Advocates Header Western Resource Advocates Header

 

November 10, 2009

Oil Shale News

 

In This Issue

  • WRA's Work
  • Quotable Quotes
  • On the Front Burner - RD&D Leasing
  • On the Front Burner - RD&D Lease Addenda
  • Looking Ahead
  • Correcting the Record
  • Recent News

 

WRA's Work 

 

In follow up to WRA’s groundbreaking report on Colorado water, Water on the Rocks: Oil Shale Water Rights in Colorado, in late September WRA began writing a new report that will investigate the nexus between Utah water and potential commercial development of oil shale and tar sands.  Our preliminary research suggests that oil shale and tar sands development will not be a good idea in Utah due to water constraints.  Water availability is essentially a zero-sum game in the Colorado River basin, with many competing views of how any new appropriations should be made.

Adding to the challenge facing water managers is climate change.  Predictions for the future include increased trans-evaporation, less rainfall, later snowfall, and earlier snowmelt.  These climatic changes would further reduce Utah’s water availability, straining an already over-tapped water system.

WRA anticipates the report will be published in March 2010.

 

  Quotable Quotes

 

“There are serious questions about whether those lease addenda are in fact legal and in fact whether or not they should be rescinded.  Taxpayers deserve answers to serious questions about why these lease addenda were granted at the eleventh hour, under what circumstances, and at what potential expense to the federal treasury.”

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, October 20, 2009

“We have a duty to ensure that potential oil shale development is done responsibly ... and done in a way that is environmentally appropriate and we want to ensure that American taxpayers get a fair return from the development of public lands.”


Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, October 20, 2009

If we are to succeed in unlocking oil shale’s great potential, we must first answer fundamental questions about water use, power use, and environmental and social impacts of commercial-scale development.”

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, October 20, 2009

“Washington must consider the effects of oil shale development in the West.  Impacts to our natural resources and landscapes would be very real. Oil shale development would diminish already limited water supplies, harm wildlife, and increase the threat of catastrophic climate change.”

Karin P. Sheldon, President, Western Resource Advocates

“The history of oil shale has been plagued with scandal and cronyism, and today’s announcement shows why we need a better approach to America’s energy.”

Bobby McEnaney, Natural Resources Defense Council

 

Oil Shale Chronology

June 9, 2005:  Call for nominations on 1st round of RD&D lease issued

Aug. 8, 2005 Energy Policy Act becomes law; directs DOI to establish commercial leasing regulations

Jan. 1, 2007: Five Colorado RD&D leases issued

July 1, 2007: One Utah RD&D lease issued

July 23, 2008: Proposed commercial regulations released

Sept. 22, 2008: WRA submits comments ondraft leasing rule

Nov. 17, 2008: Record of Decision issued opening 2 million acres of public land open to oil shale leasing

Nov. 18, 2008: Commercial regulations finalized and published

Jan. 15, 2009: Call for nominations on 2nd round of RD&D leases issued

Jan. 16, 2009: Addenda on the six research leases issued

Jan. 17, 2009: Commercial rule goes into effect

Feb. 25, 2009: Secretary Salazar withdraws Bush Administration’s call for 2nd of RD&D leases. Asks for “public comment on the terms and conditions of any future oil shale RD&D leases” that the Department may issue. 

 

 

Contact Us

 

David Abelson

Oil Shale Policy Advisor

(303) 859-1807

 

 

Peter Roessmann

Communications Coordinator

(303) 444-1188 x221

 

www.westernresourceadvocates.org

 


https://app.e2ma.net/userdata/24/images/templates/spacer.gif https://app.e2ma.net/userdata/24/images/templates/spacer.gif

 

From the President's Desk

 

Restoring order. That is Interior Secretary Ken Salazar’s  goal in correcting the Bush Administration’s oil shale policy.  In recent weeks the Secretary announced two decisions that seek to bring sound science and reason back to the federal oil shale program.

On October 20, 2009, Secretary Salazar initiated the second round of oil shale research leases (RD&D).  Western Resource Advocates believes a second round of RD&D is premature because the current RD&D lessees have barely started developing  their leases and energy companies have  substantial private resources  to use to test new technologies. Nevertheless, we applaud the Secretary’s commitment to correct the many flaws in the federal oil shale program.  The Secretary’s approach requires future lessees to evaluate the energy and water demands associated with oil shale development and its greenhouse gas contributions, and to report on the likely community impacts. 

The Secretary also asked the Inspector General to investigate the Bush Administration’s last minute awarding of lease addenda to the four companies currently holding research leases.  As the Secretary noted, these lease addenda “conveyed lucrative benefits to the leaseholders” and were done without public scrutiny.

These decisions come on the heels of the Los Angeles Times’ reports detailing a grand jury investigation focused on former Interior Secretary, Gale Norton.  Federal law bars government officials from overseeing any process that could financially benefit a company that the official is negotiating with for future employment.  As the Times reports, Secretary Norton awarded research leases to Shell Oil nine months before she went to work for their oil shale division. 

A careful examination of Salazar’s actions shows he is not simply restoring order; he is also restoring integrity and openness.  WRA’s welcomes this breath of fresh air.

 

Sincerely,

 

Karin P. Sheldon

WRA President

 

 

On the Front Burner:

RD&D Leasing

 

As noted above, on October 20th, Secretary Salazar announced the 2nd round of oil shale RD&D leases.  The details were published in the Federal Register on November 3, 2009.  The following outlines the differences between DOI’s RD&D program and that of the Bush Administration:

Lease Size  

Bush: 160 acres, plus 4,960 acres contiguous to the RD&D lease for commercial development

Obama: 160 acres, plus 480 acres contiguous to the RD&D lease for commercial development

Lease Term – Milestones and Diligence

Bush: No specific milestones requiring diligence.

Obama: Diligence milestones included in lease: Lessees must submit plan of development within nine months after BLM’s approval of the plan of development; lessees must (1) acquire state and local permits within 18 months, (2) deploy infrastructure within 24 months, and (3) submit quarterly reports detailing progress.

Lease Term -- Royalties

Bush: 2008 commercial leasing regulations apply to RD&D

Obama: If DOI approves conversion of RD&D lease to a commercial lease, royalty rate will be determined by rules in effect at conversion

Lease Term – Trigger Mechanism for Converting RD&D Lease to Commercial Lease

Bush:  Lessee must show it can produce commercial quantities

Obama:  Lessee must show it can produce commercial quantities; the Lessee must also “submit a report including engineering, economic, socioeconomic, and environmental (water, emissions, carbon footprint, etc.) data concerning its operations, outputs, and impacts.”

More information is available on the BLM website.

 


 

On the Front Burner: 

RD&D Lease Addenda

 

On January 15, 2009, DOI signed lease addenda with the four companies holding the six RD&D leases.  The addenda are now the subject of a DOI Inspector General (IG) investigation.  The IG investigates fraud, waste and abuse. Salazar’s letter can be found at this DOI link.

Added without public notice, the addenda permit the 1st round RD&D leases holders to lock in place forever the November 2008 oil shale rule that, among other things, established a low royalty rate, regardless of any new regulatory regime that might become law at a future date.  The addenda also attempt to divest the BLM from prohibiting commercial leasing should the agency determine that commercial development would result in unacceptable environmental consequences. 

 

 

Looking Ahead -

Oil Shale Tracker

 

Lawsuits – WRA and other parties remain in negotiations with the federal government to resolve suits against the 2008 oil shale leasing regulations and the 2008 decision to open up 2 million acres of federal land to commercial oil shale leasing.

2nd Round of RD&D – beginning November 3rd, interested parties have 60 days to nominate lease parcels for the next phase of RD&D leases.

Shell Yampa Water Right Filing – Litigation is ongoing.

 

         

Recent News

 

  • Bloomberg: Salazar Seeks Probe of Bush-Era U.S. Oil-Shale Leases
  • Denver Post: Investigation ordered for Colorado oil shale leases

 

 

       

Correcting the Record

   

Myth:  640 acres (1 sq. mile), the size of the potential commercial leases under DOI’s 2nd round of research leases, is insufficient to support commercial production.

 

Fact:False. 640-acre commercial leases were first proposed by the Bush Administration in January 2009. As DOI stated at that time, “the Department has determined that an R, D, and D lease of 640 acres is likely to provide reserves sufficient to support a commercial operation.” Interestingly, oil shale proponents applauded the Bush formulation.

2260 Baseline Road, Suite 200 Boulder, CO 80302
Visit us online | contact us

 

Is oil shale economically viable?  Even the federal government does not know.  And yet, in making 

the case for accelerated commercial development of oil shale and tar sands resources in Colorado, 

Utah, and Wyoming, President Bushʼs Departments of Energy (DOE) and the Interior (DOI) pointed 

to a range of macroeconomic, socioeconomic, and consumer benefi ts that would result.  However, 

a close review of data and existing studies reveals far diff erent conclusions. 

 

CLICK HERE FOR FULL REPORT

Comments

There are no comments.

Add Comment



You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to login.